Post by Sai Alhuwaliacoinage of mauryas and nandas were same and had elephants sun bull and magadha symbol
didnt had land,water,mountain
where do u find these in schthians/other places
their weight was same as that of persian and greek coins due to influence of archmedia
(in the origin of punched coins in india) in present day gandhara region.
traditions of rig veda were caried forward by brahmins/rishis
and it's the vedas that have mention of 3 upper catse..many historians think it was added on later but there's no concrete proof of the same
the earliest rig vedic written manuscript was found in CE not BCE(before christ/common era)
BRAHMINS WERE CUSTODIAN OF VEDIC CILIZATION AND CARIIED IN MEMORIES FOR CENTURIES UNTIL IT WAS WRITTEN DOWN MUCH MUCH MUCH LATER!!!
even tho later on it got relegated to minor gods
SANSKRIT IS AS OLD AS VEDIC PEOPLE ..IT WASN'T SPOKEN DURING BHUDDIST PERIOD..IT WAS VERY SIMILAR TO CRUDE AND ANCIENT INDO EUROPEAN LAGUAGES.
AND SANSKRIT MENTIONED IN RIG VEDA WAS VERY AND IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM PRESEENT DAY SPOKEN SANSKRIT..
LANGUAGE WOULD PROBABLY PALI
2)CHANDRA GUPTA MIGHT HAVE BEEN PUNJABI BUT SURE AS HELL WAS NOT SAKA..
HE PEOBABLY WAS SAKYA ..ANCIENT SUB HIMALYAN EASTERN COMMUNITTY/TRIBE..THIS IS SOMETHING MENTIONED IN BHUDDIST TEXTS AS WELL
MOURYA CLAN IS PRESENT AMONG RAJPUTS AS WELL.
MAURYAS HAD INCREDIBLE PERSIAN AND GREEK INFLUENCE DUE TO TRADING..THAT DOESNT MEAN THEY WERE PERSIAN
SO IF ARCHTITECHTURE RESEMBLED SOME PERSIAN INFLUENCE..THEN IT'S NO WONDER
the Buddhist custom says that the Chandragupta was an individual from the Maurya Kashtriya group of Pippi Halivana. The custom in this manner suggests that the Moriya faction was connected to the Sakya clan to which Gautma Buddha had a place. This infers that the Mauryas in some sense, were Kshatriyas. The Maurya title of the Chandragupta's family is said to have been obtained from the Moriya clan.